When choosing the right tracking software for affiliate marketing and campaign optimization, the decision can significantly impact your return on investment (ROI).
A reliable tracking system provides actionable data, supports campaign optimization, and helps manage advertising budgets more efficiently. Two of the most recognized tracking solutions in the industry are CPV Lab and Voluum.
While both have strong followings, they cater to different user needs. This comparison explores why CPV Lab remains the superior choice for marketers prioritizing flexibility, control, and value.
Content Outline
Why You Need a Tracking System?
A robust tracking system is indispensable for monitoring campaigns.
It collects data on user interactions, such as clicks, conversions, and revenue, allowing marketers to make data-driven decisions. Effective tracking can help refine campaigns, target the right audiences, test different offers, and maximize advertising budgets.
Consider managing multiple campaigns across platforms like Google Ads, Facebook, or TikTok without a tracking system—you’d lack the critical insights needed to identify high-performing ads, traffic sources, or valuable user segments.
CPV Lab and Voluum provide marketers with the tools needed to oversee and optimize complex campaigns effectively.
CPV Lab vs Voluum 2024: Overview
What is CPV Lab?
CPV Lab is a powerful, self-hosted ad tracker that has been evolving since its inception in 2010. Under new management since 2018, CPV Lab Pro was launched, integrating new features and improvements.
CPV Lab is ideal for marketers who handle traffic from various sources and seek full control over their data.
With CPV Lab, you can track campaigns across all channels, attribute conversions accurately, split-test landing pages, filter bot traffic, and use conversion APIs to send data back to traffic sources.
What is Voluum?
Voluum is a cloud-based ad tracking platform developed by the founder of Zeropark, designed with affiliate marketers in mind.
The platform has evolved over time to include advanced features, such as traffic distribution AI and campaign automation, making it popular among marketers looking for simplicity and speed.
CPV Lab vs Voluum: Flexibility and Customization
CPV Lab:
CPV Lab is renowned for its flexibility and customization. As a self-hosted platform, it allows you to tailor the system to meet specific campaign requirements.
You can track direct linking, landing pages, multi-step funnels, and complex sequences without extra coding. CPV Lab supports multivariate testing, enabling marketers to test different landing page variations, offers, and ads simultaneously.
Additionally, rule-based optimization lets users set specific criteria to highlight ads that meet performance thresholds, providing granular control over campaign management.
Voluum:
Voluum’s cloud-based nature offers limited customization compared to CPV Lab. While it is user-friendly and streamlined, it lacks the depth of configuration that advanced marketers often need.
The platform does not include multivariate testing, a key tool for optimizing various campaign elements concurrently. Voluum’s strength lies in its pre-configured setups, making it easy to deploy campaigns quickly but restricting comprehensive customization.
Winner: CPV Lab
CPV Lab’s high degree of flexibility and self-hosted nature make it the top choice for marketers who prioritize control and in-depth testing.
CPV Lab vs Voluum: Ease of Use and Setup
CPV Lab:
Setting up CPV Lab requires some technical expertise as it is self-hosted. Users must install the software on a server (VPS or dedicated) and handle ongoing maintenance.
While this setup provides complete control, it is more hands-on and less beginner-friendly. CPV Lab’s interface is robust but may take time to get accustomed to due to its functional rather than aesthetic design.
Voluum:
Voluum is cloud-based, meaning no server setup or management is required. Users can get started within minutes, and the platform’s modern, intuitive interface makes it accessible even to beginners. The automated infrastructure eliminates technical concerns, allowing marketers to focus on campaign management.
Winner: Voluum
Voluum wins for ease of use and setup thanks to its cloud-based design and beginner-friendly interface.
CPV Lab vs Voluum: Scalability and Performance
CPV Lab:
Scalability with CPV Lab depends on the server setup. While it performs well for low-to-medium traffic campaigns, high-volume operations may require significant server management and optimization to maintain speed and prevent crashes.
Voluum:
Voluum’s cloud-based architecture handles scalability seamlessly, accommodating billions of clicks per day without performance issues. The platform’s distributed server network ensures fast redirects and optimal performance for international traffic.
Winner: Voluum
Voluum’s cloud infrastructure and ability to handle high-traffic volumes without manual maintenance make it the better option for scalability.
CPV Lab vs Voluum: Data Privacy and Control
CPV Lab:
As a self-hosted solution, CPV Lab offers full control over your data. Only you have access to your campaign data, which can be secured with your own protocols and backups. This level of control is ideal for marketers focused on data privacy and security.
Voluum:
Voluum’s cloud-based nature means your data is stored on its servers. While advanced security measures are in place, data privacy concerns persist as third-party servers handle your information. For marketers with high-stakes campaigns, this could be a drawback.
Winner: CPV Lab
CPV Lab wins for data privacy and control, as its self-hosted setup ensures marketers retain full data ownership.
CPV Lab vs Voluum: Pricing Model and Long-Term Value
CPV Lab:
CPV Lab offers three pricing tiers:
- Starter: $48/month (billed annually at $577) with 2 campaign types, 10+ reports, and 20+ data points.
- Pro: $81/month (billed annually at $977) with 6 comprehensive campaign types, 20+ reports, 30+ data points, and 10 custom tracking domains.
- Expert: $123/month (billed annually at $1477) with advanced features including multivariate testing, 50 custom tracking domains, and priority support.
Voluum:
Voluum’s subscription model includes:
- Profit: $149/month for 20 active campaigns, 6 months of data retention, and up to 1,000,000 events.
- Scale: $349/month for 60 active campaigns, 12 months of data retention, and up to 5,000,000 events.
- Start-up: $599/month for 100 active campaigns, 12 months of data retention, and up to 10,000,000 events.
Winner: CPV Lab
CPV Lab’s pricing structure provides better long-term value with its cost-effective annual plans compared to Voluum’s higher subscription fees for large-scale operations.
Pros & Cons of CPVLab
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pros & Cons of Voluum
| Pros of Voluum | Cons of Voluum |
|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quick Links:
Conclusion: Why CPV Lab Wins?
While Voluum excels in ease of use, scalability, and modern conveniences, CPV Lab is the clear winner for marketers seeking flexibility, control, data privacy, and long-term cost savings.
CPV Lab’s self-hosted model provides advanced customization and full data ownership, making it the superior choice for those prioritizing comprehensive tracking capabilities.
Voluum may be ideal for beginners or those looking for a simple, plug-and-play solution, but CPV Lab remains unmatched for advanced users.
